Web
and Book
design, Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2006 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
Click
Here to return to |
(HOME) |
THE CLERK OF THE
WOODS A SHORT MONTH MAY is the
shortest
month in the year. February is at least twice as long. For a month is
like a
movement of a symphony; and when we speak of the length of a piece of
music we
are not thinking of the number of notes in it, but of the time it takes
to play
them. May is a scherzo, and goes like the wind. Yesterday it was just
beginning, and to-day it is almost done. “If we could only hold it
back!” an
outdoor friend of mine used to say. And I say so, too. At the most
generous
calculation I cannot have more than a hundred more of such months to
hope for,
and I wish the Master's baton
would not hurry the tempo.
But
who knows? Perhaps there will be another series of concerts, in a
better music
hall. The world
hereabout
will never be more beautiful than it was eight or ten days ago, with
the sugar
maples and the Norway maples in bloom and the tall valley willows in
young
yellow-green leaf. And now forsythia is having its turn. How thick it
is! I
should not have believed it half so common. Every dooryard is bright
with its
sunny splendor. “Sunshine bush,” it deserves to be called, with no
thought of
disrespect for Mr. Forsyth, whoever he may have been. I look at the
show while
it lasts. In a week or two the bushes will all have gone out of
commission, so
to speak, till the year comes round again. Shrubs are much in the case
of men
and women; the amount of attention they receive depends mainly on the
dress
they happen to have on at the moment. In my next-door neighbor's yard
there is
a forsythia bush, not exceptionally large or handsome, that gives me as
much
pleasure as one of those wonderful tulip beds of which the Boston city
gardeners make so much account. Are a million tulips, all of one color,
crowded
tightly together and bordered by a row of other tulips, all of another
color,
really so much more beautiful than a hundred or two, of various tints,
loosely
and naturally disposed? I ask the question without answering it,
though I
could answer it easily enough, so far as my own taste is concerned. Already
there is
much to admire in the wild garden. Spice-bush blossoms have come and
gone, and
now the misty shad-blow is beginning to whiten all the hedges and the
borders
of the wood, while sassafras trees have put forth pretty clusters of
yellowish
flowers for the few that will come out to see them. Sun-bright,
cold-footed
cowslips still hold their color along shaded brooks. “Marsh marigolds,”
some
critical people tell us we must call them. That is a good name, too;
but the
flowers are no more marigolds than cowslips, and with or without reason
(partly, it may be, because my unregenerate nature resents the
“must”), I like
the word I was brought up with. Anemones and violets are becoming
plentiful,
and the first columbines already swing from the clefts Of outcropping
ledges.
With them one is almost certain to find the saxifrage. The two are fast
friends, though very unlike; the columbine drooping and swaying so
gracefully,
its honey-jars upside down, the saxifrage holding upright its cluster
of tiny
white cups, like so many wine-glasses on a tray. Both are children's
flowers, —
an honorable class, — and have in themselves, to my apprehension, a
kind of
childish innocence and sweetness. If we picked no other blossoms, clown
in the
Old Colony, we always picked these two — these and the nodding anemone
and the
pink lady's-slipper. This showy
orchid,
by the way, I was pleased a year ago to see in bloom side by side with
the
trailing arbutus. One was near the end of its flowering season, the
other just
at the beginning, but there they stood, within a few yards of each
other. This
was in the Franconia Notch, at the foot of Echo Lake, where plants
bloom when
they can, rather than according to any calendar known to down-country
people;
where within the space of a dozen yards you may see the dwarf cornel,
for
example, in all stages of growth; here, where a snowbank stayed late,
just
peeping out of the ground, and there, in a sunnier spot, already in
full bloom.
In May the
birds
come home. This is really what makes the month so short. There is no
time to
see half that is going on. In this town alone it would take a score of
good
walkers, good lookers, and good listeners to welcome all the pretty
creatures
that will this month return from their winter's exile. Some came in
March, of
course, and more in April; but now they are coming in troops. It is
great fun
to see them; a pleasure inexpressible to wake in the morning, as I did
this
morning (May 8), and still lying in bed, to hear the first breezy
fifing of a
Baltimore oriole, just back over night after an eight months' absence.
Birds
must be lovers of home to continue living in a climate where life is
possible
to them only four months of the year. Six days
ago (May
2) a rose-breasted grosbeak gladdened the morning in a similar manner,
though
he was a little farther away, so that I did not hear him until I
stepped out
upon the piazza. I stood still a minute or two, listening to the sweet
“rolling” warble, and then crossed the street to have a look at the
rose
color. It was just as bright as I remembered it. Golden warblers (summer yellow-birds) made their appearance on the last day of April. The next morning one had dropped into an ideal summering place, a bit of thicket beside a pond and a lively brook, — good shelter, good bathing, and plenty of insects, — and from the first moment seemed to have no thought of looking farther. I see and hear him every time I pass the spot. The same leafless thicket (but it will be leafy enough by and by) is now inhabited by a catbird. I found him on the 6th, already much at home, feeding, singing, and mewing. Between him and his small, high-colored neighbor there is no sign of rivalry or ill-feeling; but if another catbird or a second warbler should propose settlement in that clump of shrubbery, I have no doubt there would be trouble. May-day
brought me
the yellow-throated vireo, the parula warbler, the white-throated
sparrow, and
the least flycatcher, the last two pretty late, by my reckoning. On the
2d came
the warbling vireo, the veery, — a single silent bird, the only one I
have yet
seen, — the kingbird, the Maryland yellow‑throat, the oven-bird, and
the
chestnut-sided warbler, in addition to the grosbeak before mentioned.
Then
followed a spell of cold, unfavorable weather, and nothing more was
listed
until the 6th. That clay I saw a Nashville warbler, — several days
tardy, — a
catbird, and a Swainson thrush. On May 7, I heard my first prairie
warbler, and
today has brought the oriole, the wood thrush, one silent red-eyed
vireo (it
is good to know that this voluble “preacher” can
be silent), and the redstart. It never happened to me before, I think,
to see
the Swainson thrush earlier than the wood. That I have done so this
season is
doubtless the result of some accident, on one side or the other. The
Swainson
was a little ahead of his regular schedule, I feel sure; but on the
other hand,
it may almost be taken for granted that a few wood thrushes have been
in the
neighborhood for several days. The probability that any single observer
will
light upon the very first silent bird of a given species that drops
into a
township must be slight indeed. What we see, we tell of; but that is
only the
smallest part of what happens. Some of
our winter
birds still go about in flocks, notably the waxwings, the goldfinches,
and the
purple finches. Two days ago I noticed a goldfinch that was almost in
full
nuptial dress; as bright as he ever would be, I should say, but with
the black
and the yellow still running together a little here and there. Purple
finches
are living high — in two senses — just at present, feeding on the
pendent
flower-buds of tall beech trees. A bunch of six or eight that I watched
the
other day were literally stuffing themselves, till I thought of turkeys
stuffed
with chestnuts. Their capacity was marvelous, and I left them still
feasting.
All the while one of them kept up a happy musical chatter. There is no
reason,
I suppose, why a poet should not be a good feeder. |