Web and Book design, |
Click Here to return to |
I have already spoken of the
fox at some length, but it will take a chapter by itself to do half
justice to
his portrait.
He furnishes, perhaps, the
only instance that can be cited of a fur-bearing animal that not only
holds its
own, but that actually increases in the face of the means that are used
for its
extermination. The beaver, for instance, was gone before the earliest
settlers
could get a sight of him; and even the mink and marten are now only
rarely
seen, or not seen at all, in places where they were once abundant.
But the fox has survived
civilization, and in some localities is no doubt more abundant now than
in the
time of the Revolution. For half a century at least he has been almost
the only
prize, in the way of fur, that was to be found on our mountains, and he
has
been hunted and trapped and waylaid, sought for as game and pursued in
enmity,
taken by fair means and by foul, and yet there seems not the slightest
danger
of the species becoming extinct.
One would think that a
single hound in a neighborhood, filling the mountains with his bayings,
and
leaving no nook or byway of them unexplored, was enough to drive and
scare
every fox from the country. But not so. Indeed, I am almost tempted to
say, the
more hounds, the more foxes.
I recently spent a summer
month in a mountainous district in the State of New York, where, from
its
earliest settlement, the red fox has been the standing prize for skill
in the
use of the trap and gun. At the house where I was staying were two
foxhounds,
and a neighbor half a mile distant had a third. There were many others
in the
township, and in season they were well employed, too; but the three
spoken of,
attended by their owners, held high carnival on the mountains in the
immediate
vicinity. And many were the foxes that, winter after winter, fell
before them,
twenty-five having been shot, the season before my visit, on one small
range
alone. And yet the foxes were apparently never more abundant than they
were
that summer, and never bolder, coming at night within a few rods of the
house,
and of the unchained alert hounds, and making havoc among the poultry.
One morning a large, fat
goose was found minus her head and otherwise mangled. Both hounds had
disappeared, and, as they did not come back till near night, it was
inferred
that they had cut short Reynard's repast, and given him a good chase
into the
bargain. But next night he was back again, and this time got safely off
with
the goose. A couple of nights after he must have come with recruits,
for next
morning three large goslings were reported missing. The silly geese now
got it
through their noddles that there was danger about, and every night
thereafter
came close up to the house to roost.
A brood of turkeys, the old
one tied to a tree a few rods to the rear of the house, were the next
objects
of attack. The predaceous rascal came, as usual, in the latter half of
the
night. I happened to be awake, and heard the helpless turkey cry
"quit," "quit," with great emphasis. Another sleeper, on
the floor above me, who, it seems, had been sleeping with one ear awake
for
several nights in apprehension for the safety of his turkeys, heard the
sound
also, and instantly divined its cause. I heard the window open and a
voice
summon the dogs. A loud bellow was the response, which caused Reynard
to take
himself off in a hurry. A moment more, and the mother turkey would have
shared
the fate of the geese. There she lay at the end of her tether, with
extended
wings, bitten and rumpled. The young ones, roosting in a row on the
fence near
by, had taken flight on the first alarm.
Turkeys, retaining many of
their wild instincts, are less easily captured by the fox than any
other of our
domestic fowls. On the slightest show of danger they take to wing, and
it is
not unusual, in the locality of which I speak, to find them in the
morning
perched in the most unwonted places, as on the peak of the barn or
hay-shed, or
on the tops of the apple-trees, their tails spread and their manners
showing
much excitement. Perchance one turkey is minus her tail, the fox having
succeeded in getting only a mouthful of quills.
As the brood grows and their
wings develop, they wander far from the house in quest of grasshoppers.
At such
times they are all watchfulness and suspicion. Crossing the fields one
day,
attended by a dog that much resembled a fox, I came suddenly upon a
brood about
one third grown, which were feeding in a pasture just beyond a wood. It
so
happened that they caught sight of the dog without seeing me, when
instantly,
with the celerity of wild game, they launched into the air, and, while
the old
one perched upon a treetop, as if to keep an eye on the supposed enemy,
the
young went sailing over the trees toward home.
The two hounds above
referred to, accompanied by a cur-dog, whose business it was to mind
the farm,
but who took as much delight in running away from prosy duty as if he
had been
a schoolboy, would frequently steal off and have a good hunt all by
themselves,
just for the fun of the thing, I suppose. I more than half suspect that
it was
as a kind of taunt or retaliation, that Reynard came and took the geese
from
under their very noses. One morning they went off and stayed till the
afternoon
of the next day; they ran the fox all day and all night, the hounds
baying at
every jump, the cur-dog silent and tenacious. When the trio returned,
they came
dragging themselves along, stiff, footsore, gaunt, and hungry. For a
day or two
afterward they lay about the kennels, seeming to dread nothing so much
as the
having to move. The stolen hunt was their "spree," their "bender,"
and of course they must take time to get over it.
Some old hunters think the
fox enjoys the chase as much as the hound, especially when the latter
runs
slow, as the best hounds do. The fox will wait for the hound, will sit
down and
listen, or play about, crossing and recrossing and doubling upon his
track, as
if enjoying a mischievous consciousness of the perplexity he would
presently
cause his pursuer. It is evident, however, that the fox does not always
have
his share of the fun: before a swift dog, or in a deep snow, or on a
wet day,
when his tail gets heavy, he must put his best foot forward. As a last
resort
he "holes up." Sometimes he resorts to numerous devices to mislead
and escape the dog altogether. He will walk in the bed of a small
creek, or on
a rail-fence. I heard of an instance of a fox, hard and long pressed,
that took
to a rail-fence, and, after walking some distance, made a leap to one
side to a
hollow stump, in the cavity of which he snugly stowed himself. The ruse
succeeded, and the dogs lost the trail; but the hunter, coming up,
passed by
chance near the stump, when out bounded the fox, his cunning availing
him less
than he deserved. On another occasion the fox took to the public road,
and
stepped with great care and precision into a sleigh-track. The hard,
polished
snow took no imprint of the light foot, and the scent was no doubt less
than it
would have been on a rougher surface. Maybe, also, the rogue had
considered the
chances of another sleigh coming along, before the hound, and
obliterating the
trail entirely.
Audubon tells us of a
certain fox, which, when started by the hounds, always managed to elude
them at
a certain point. Finally the hunter concealed himself in the locality,
to
discover, if possible, the trick. Presently along came the fox, and,
making a
leap to one side, ran up the trunk of a fallen tree which had lodged
some feet
from the ground, and concealed himself in the top. In a few minutes the
hounds
came up, and in their eagerness passed some distance beyond the point,
and then
went still farther, looking for the lost trail. Then the fox hastened
down,
and, taking his back-track, fooled the dogs completely.
I was told of a silver-gray
fox in northern New York, which, when pursued by the hounds, would run
till it
had hunted up another fox, or the fresh trail of one, when it would so
manœuvre
that the hound would invariably be switched off on the second track.
In cold, dry weather the fox
will sometimes elude the hound, at least delay him much, by taking to a
bare,
plowed field. The hard dry earth seems not to retain a particle of the
scent,
and the hound gives a loud, long, peculiar bark, to signify he has
trouble. It
is now his turn to show his wit, which he often does by passing
completely
around the field, and resuming the trail again where it crosses the
fence or a
strip of snow.
The fact that any dry, hard
surface is unfavorable to the hound suggests, in a measure, the
explanation of
the wonderful faculty that all dogs in a degree possess to track an
animal by
the scent of the foot alone. Did you ever think why a dog's nose is
always wet?
Examine the nose of a foxhound, for instance; how very moist and
sensitive!
Cause this moisture to dry up, and the dog would be as powerless to
track an
animal as you are! The nose of the cat, you may observe, is but a
little moist,
and, as you know, her sense of smell is far inferior to that of the
dog.
Moisten your own nostrils and lips, and this sense is plainly
sharpened. The
sweat of a dog's nose, therefore, is no doubt a vital element in its
power,
and, without taking a very long logical stride, we may infer how much a
damp,
rough surface aids him in tracking game.
A fox hunt in this country
is, of course, quite a different thing from what it is in England,
where all
the squires and noblemen of a borough, superbly mounted, go riding over
the
country, guided by the yelling hounds, till the fox is literally run
down and
murdered. Here the hunter prefers a rough, mountainous country, and, as
probably most persons know, takes advantage of the disposition of the
fox, when
pursued by the hound, to play or circle around a ridge or bold point,
and,
taking his stand near the run-way, shoots him down.
I recently had the pleasure
of a turn with some experienced hunters. As we ascended the ridge
toward the
mountain, keeping in our ears the uncertain baying of the hounds as
they slowly
unraveled an old trail, my companions pointed out to me the different
run-ways,
— a gap in the fence here, a rock just below the brow of the hill
there, that
tree yonder near the corner of the woods, or the end of that stone wall
looking
down the side-hill, or commanding a cow-path, or the outlet of a
wood-road. A
half-wild apple orchard near a cross-road was pointed out as an
invariable
run-way, where the fox turned toward the mountain again, after having
been
driven down the ridge. There appeared to be no reason why the foxes
should
habitually pass any particular point, yet the hunters told me that year
after
year they took about the same turns, each generation of foxes running
through
the upper corner of that field, or crossing the valley near yonder
stone wall,
when pursued by the dog. It seems the fox when he finds himself
followed is
perpetually tempted to turn in his course, to deflect from a right
line, as a person
would undoubtedly be under similar circumstances. If he is on this side
of the
ridge, when he hears the dog break around on his trail he speedily
crosses to
the other side; if he is in the fields, he takes again to the woods; if
in the
valley, he hastens to the high land, and evidently enjoys running along
the
ridge and listening to the dogs, slowly tracing out his course in the
fields
below. At such times he appears to have but one sense, hearing, and
that seems
to be reverted toward his pursuers. He is constantly pausing, looking
back and
listening, and will almost run over the hunter if he stands still, even
though
not at all concealed.
Animals of this class depend
far less upon their sight than upon their hearing and sense of smell.
Neither
the fox nor the dog is capable of much discrimination with the eye;
they seem
to see things only in the mass; but with the nose they can analyze and
define,
and get at the most subtle shades of difference. The fox will not read
a man
from a stump or a rock, unless he gets his scent, and the dog does not
know his
master in a crowd until he has smelled him.
On the occasion to which I
refer, it was not many minutes after the dogs entered the woods on the
side of
the mountain before they gave out sharp and eager, and we knew at once
that the
fox was started. We were then near a point that had been designated as
a sure
run-way, and hastened to get into position with all speed. For my part
I was so
taken with the music of the hounds, as it swelled up over the ridge,
that I
quite forgot the game. I saw one of my companions leveling his gun,
and,
looking a few rods to the right, saw the fox coming right on to us. I
had
barely time to note the silly and abashed expression that came over him
as he
saw us in his path, when he was cut down as by a flash of lightning.
The rogue
did not appear frightened, but ashamed and out of countenance, as one
does when
some trick has been played upon him, or when detected in some mischief.
Late in the afternoon, as we
were passing through a piece of woods in the valley below, another fox,
the
third that day, broke from his cover in an old treetop, under our very
noses,
and drew the fire of three of our party, myself among the number, but,
thanks
to the interposing trees and limbs, escaped unhurt. Then the dogs took
up the
trail and there was lively music again. The fox steered through the
fields
direct for the ridge where we had passed up in the morning. We knew he
would
take a turn here and then point for the mountain, and two of us, with
the hope
of cutting him off by the old orchard, through which we were again
assured he
would surely pass, made a precipitous rush for that point. It was
nearly half a
mile distant, most of the way up a steep side-hill, and if the fox took
the
circuit indicated he would probably be there in twelve or fifteen
minutes.
Running up an angle of 45 degrees seems quite easy work for a
four-footed beast
like a dog or a fox, but for a two-legged animal like a man it is very
heavy
and awkward. Before I got halfway up there seemed to be a vacuum all
about me,
so labored was my breathing, and when I reached the summit my head swam
and my
knees were about giving out; but pressing on, I had barely time to
reach a
point in the road abreast of the orchard, when I heard the hounds, and,
looking
under the trees, saw the fox, leaping high above the weeds and grass,
coming
straight toward me. He evidently had not got over the first scare,
which our
haphazard fusillade had given him, and was making unusually quick time.
I was
armed with a rifle, and said to myself that now was the time to win the
laurels
I had coveted. For half a day previous I had been practicing on a
pumpkin which
a patient youth had rolled down a hill for me, and had improved my shot
considerably. Now a yellow pumpkin was coming which was not a pumpkin,
and for
the first time during the day opportunity favored me. I expected the
fox to
cross the road a few yards below me, but just then I heard him whisk
through
the grass, and he bounded upon the fence a few yards above. He seemed
to cringe
as he saw his old enemy, and to depress his fur to half his former
dimensions.
Three bounds and he had cleared the road, when my bullet tore up the
sod beside
him, but to this hour I do not know whether I looked at the fox without
seeing
my gun, or whether I did sight him across its barrel. I only know that
I did
not distinguish myself in the use of the rifle on that occasion, and
went home
to wreak my revenge upon another pumpkin; but without much improvement
of my
skill, for, a few days after, another fox ran under my very nose with
perfect
impunity. There is something so fascinating in the sudden appearance of
the fox
that the eye is quite mastered, and, unless the instinct of the
sportsman is
very strong and quick, the prey will slip through his grasp.
A still hunt rarely brings
you in sight of a fox, as his ears are much sharper than yours, and his
tread
much lighter. But if the fox is mousing in the fields, and you discover
him
before he does you, you may, the wind favoring, call him within a few
paces of
you. Secrete yourself behind the fence, or some other object, and
squeak as
nearly like a mouse as possible. Reynard will hear the sound at an
incredible
distance. Pricking up his ears, he gets the direction, and comes
trotting along
as unsuspiciously as can be. I have never had an opportunity to try the
experiment, but I know perfectly reliable persons who have. One man, in
the
pasture getting his cows, called a fox which was too busy mousing to
get the
first sight, till it jumped upon the wall just over where he sat
secreted.
Giving a loud whoop and jumping up at the same time, the fox came as
near being
frightened out of his skin as I suspect a fox ever was.
In trapping for a fox, you
get perhaps about as much "fun" and as little fur as in any trapping
amusement you can engage in. The one feeling that ever seems present to
the
mind of Reynard is suspicion. He does not need experience to teach him,
but
seems to know from the jump that there is such a thing as a trap, and
that a
trap has a way of grasping a fox's paw that is more frank than
friendly.
Cornered in a hole or a den, a trap can be set so that the poor
creature has
the desperate alternative of being caught or starving. He is generally
caught,
though not till he has braved hunger for a good many days.
But to know all his cunning
and shrewdness, bait him in the field, or set your trap by some carcass
where
he is wont to come. In some cases he will uncover the trap, and leave
the marks
of his contempt for it in a way you cannot mistake, or else he will not
approach within a rod of it. Occasionally, however, he finds in a
trapper more
than his match, and is fairly caught. When this happens, the trap,
which must
be of the finest make, is never touched with the bare hand, but, after
being
thoroughly smoked and greased, is set in a bed of dry ashes or chaff in
a
remote field, where the fox has been emboldened to dig for several
successive
nights for morsels of toasted cheese.
A light fall of snow aids
the trapper's art and conspires to Reynard's ruin. But how lightly he
is
caught, when caught at all! barely the end of his toes, or at most a
spike
through the middle of his foot. I once saw a large painting of a fox
struggling
with a trap which held him by the hind leg, above the gambrel-joint! A
painting
alongside of it represented a peasant driving an ox-team from the
offside! A
fox would be as likely to be caught above the gambrel-joint as a farmer
would
to drive his team from the off-side. I knew one that was caught by the
tip of
the lower jaw. He came nightly, and took the morsel of cheese from the
pan of
the trap without springing it. A piece was then secured to the pan by a
thread,
with the result as above stated.
I have never been able to
see clearly why the mother fox generally selects a burrow or hole in
the open
field in which to have her young, except it be, as some hunters
maintain, for
better security. The young foxes are wont to come out on a warm day,
and play
like puppies in front of the den. The view being unobstructed on all
sides by
trees or bushes, in the cover of which danger might approach, they are
less
liable to surprise and capture. On the slightest sound they disappear
in the
hole. Those who have watched the gambols of young foxes speak of them
as very amusing,
even more arch and playful than those of kittens, while a spirit
profoundly
wise and cunning seems to look out of their young eyes. The parent fox
can
never be caught in the den with them, but is hovering near the woods,
which are
always at hand, and by her warning cry or bark tells them when to be on
their
guard. She usually has at least three, dens, at no great distance
apart, and
moves stealthily in the night with her charge from one to the other, so
as to
mislead her enemies. Many a party of boys, and of men, too, discovering
the
whereabouts of a litter, have gone with shovels and picks, and, after
digging
away vigorously for several hours, have found only an empty hole for
their
pains. The old fox, finding her secret had been found out, had waited
for
darkness, in the cover of which to transfer her household to new
quarters; or
else some old fox-hunter, jealous of the preservation of his game, and
getting
word of the intended destruction of the litter, had gone at dusk the
night
before, and made some disturbance about the den, perhaps flashed some
powder in
its mouth, — a hint which the shrewd animal knew how to
interpret.
The more scientific aspects
of the question may not be without interest to some of my readers. The
fox
belongs to the great order of flesh-eating animals called Carnivora,
and
of the family called Canidæ, or dogs. The wolf is a kind
of wild dog,
and the fox is a kind of wolf. Foxes, unlike wolves, however, never go
in packs
or companies, but hunt singly. The fox has a kind of bark which
suggests the
dog, as have all the members of this family. The kinship is further
shown by
the fact that during certain periods, for the most part in the summer,
the dog
cannot be made to attack or even to pursue the female fox, but will run
from her
in the most shamefaced manner, which he will not do in the case of any
other
animal except a wolf. Many of the ways and manners of the fox, when
tamed, are
also like the dog's. I once saw a young red fox exposed for sale in the
market
in Washington. A colored man had him, and said he had caught him out in
Virginia. He led him by a small chain, as he would a puppy, and the
innocent
young rascal would lie on his side and bask and sleep in the sunshine,
amid all
the noise and chaffering around him, precisely like a dog. He was about
the
size of a full-grown cat, and there was a bewitching beauty about him
that I
could hardly resist. On another occasion, I saw a gray fox, about two
thirds
grown, playing with a dog of about the same size, and by nothing in the
manners
of either could you tell which was the dog and which the fox.
Some naturalists think there
are but two permanent species of the fox in the United States, namely,
the gray
fox and the red fox, though there are five or six varieties. The gray
fox,
which is much smaller and less valuable than the red, is the Southern
species,
and is said to be rarely found north of Maryland, though in certain
rocky
localities along the Hudson it is common.
In the Southern States this
fox is often hunted in the English fashion, namely, on horseback, the
riders
tearing through the country in pursuit till the animal is run down and
caught.
This is the only fox that will tree. When too closely pressed, instead
of
taking to a den or a hole, it climbs beyond the reach of the dogs in
some small
tree.
The red fox is the Northern
species, and is rarely found farther south than the mountainous
districts of
Virginia. In the Arctic regions it gives place to the Arctic fox, which
most of
the season is white.
The prairie fox, the cross
fox, and the black or silver-gray fox seem only varieties of the red
fox, as
the black squirrel breeds from the gray, and the black woodchuck is
found with
the brown. There is little to distinguish them from the red, except the
color,
though the prairie fox is said to be the larger of the two.
The cross fox is dark brown
on its muzzle and extremities, with a cross of red and black on its
shoulders
and breast, which peculiarity of coloring, and not any trait in its
character,
gives it its name. It is very rare, and few hunters have ever seen one.
The
American Fur Company used to obtain annually from fifty to one hundred
skins.
The skins formerly sold for twenty-five dollars, though I believe they
now
bring only about five dollars.
The black or silver-gray fox
is the rarest of all, and its skin the most valuable. The Indians used
to
estimate it equal to forty beaver skins. The great fur companies seldom
collect
in a single season more than four or five skins at any one post. Most
of those
of the American Fur Company come from the head-waters of the
Mississippi. One
of the younger Audubons shot one in northern New York. The fox had been
seen
and fired at many times by the hunters of the neighborhood, and had
come to
have the reputation of leading a charmed life, and of being
invulnerable to
anything but a silver bullet. But Audubon brought her down (for it was
a
female) on the second trial. She had a litter of young in the vicinity,
which
he also dug out, and found the nest to hold three black and four red
ones,
which fact settled the question with him that black and red often have
the same
parentage, and are in truth the same species.
The color of this fox, in a
point-blank view, is black, but viewed at an angle it is a dark
silver-gray,
whence has arisen the notion that the black and the silver-gray are
distinct
varieties. The tip of the tail is always white.
In almost every neighborhood
there are traditions of this fox, and it is the dream of young
sportsmen; but I
have yet to meet the person who has seen one. I should go well to the
north,
into the British Possessions, if I were bent on obtaining a specimen.
One more item from the
books. From the fact that in the bone caves in this country skulls of
the gray
fox are found, but none of the red, it is inferred by some naturalists
that the
red fox is a descendant from the European species, which it resembles
in form
but surpasses in beauty, and its appearance on this continent is of
comparatively recent date.